A new UAE company has nothing a lender can hold, and that is the whole financing problem

Somewhere near the end of a business setup pitch there is a line about access to finance. Bank loans, angel investors, venture capital, government funds — presented as a shelf the licence gives you the key to. It is the most confidently written sentence on most setup pages and the least examined, because it describes an outcome nobody selling a licence has ever been asked to deliver.

The correction is not that money is unavailable in the UAE. It is that credit anywhere is extended against two things — something the lender can take, and a record of what you did with money before — and the act of incorporating a company creates neither. A licence produces a legal person with no trading history, no filed accounts, no credit file and no assets beyond whatever the shareholder has put in. That entity is not a weak borrower. It is not yet a borrower at all, and the whole of what follows is about what fills that gap and what each filling costs.

Nine and a half per cent, and it is not a Dubai problem

The Central Bank publishes the number, and it is the one figure in this market that settles the argument without any interpretation. At the end of the first half of 2024, banks in the UAE had extended around AED 81.2 billion of loans and facilities to small and medium enterprises. Over the same period the commercial and industrial sectors as a whole carried roughly AED 855.7 billion. Small and medium businesses were therefore about 9.5% of it.

That is not a local failing and it is not evidence that a UAE bank is unusually hard to deal with. It is what the same statistic looks like in most jurisdictions, for the same reason: the cost of assessing and monitoring a small borrower does not fall with the size of the loan, and the security available to cover the mistake is thin. Read it as the base rate you are arguing against, not as an obstacle a good consultant removes.

The company has no past, so the lender reads the person

Al Etihad Credit Bureau was set up under Federal Law No. 6 of 2010 on Credit Information, and its mandate is not limited to individuals. It collects credit information on companies too, aggregates it from the institutions that lend, and produces reports and scores that a bank pulls before it prices anything.

For a company formed this quarter, that file exists and is empty. Nothing has been drawn, nothing has been repaid, and there is no behaviour to score. So the assessment moves to the only party with a record: the shareholder. This is the practical reason a founder's personal borrowing history in the UAE — a car facility, a card, a mortgage, a missed instalment three years ago — turns up in a conversation that was supposed to be about the company. It is also why arriving with a clean personal file and a lived-in personal account is worth more at the start than any document a formation agent can produce.

It follows that the company's own credit file is not a thing you are given. It is a thing you accumulate, and the earliest deposits into it are small and dull: an operating account that is actually operated, a facility taken and repaid rather than avoided, a supplier line settled on time. Our banking advisory page covers what the account itself requires, which is a separate exercise from what a facility requires.

Four things a lender can hold, and a new company owns none of them by default

Strip the marketing away and a UAE lender is looking for one of a very short list of things. Each is a real, documented arrangement rather than a matter of persuasion.

A personal guarantee from the shareholder. The commonest answer, and the one least often described plainly at the point of signing. It moves the risk from the company back to the person and undoes, for that debt, the limited liability the company was formed to provide. It is not a formality and it does not expire when you sell the business unless it is released in writing.

Cash the lender already holds. A margin, a lien over a fixed deposit, or a facility secured by a balance in the same bank. It is the cheapest security to give and the least useful, because a business that has the cash to pledge usually does not have the problem the facility was meant to solve.

A security interest over movable assets. This is the part of the picture that genuinely changed, and almost nothing written for founders mentions it. Federal Law No. 4 of 2020 on Securing Interest in Movable Property, with its executive regulation in Cabinet Resolution No. 29 of 2021, replaced the earlier 2016 pledge regime and built a federal framework for taking security over things a business owns but cannot hand over — receivables and payables, balances in bank accounts, equipment, tools and fixtures, goods held for sale or lease, and raw materials, present and future. Security is made effective against third parties by filing a notice on the federal movable collateral record, and priority runs from that filing. In plain terms: a trading company with stock in a warehouse, or a services company with invoices out to solid customers, has more to offer a lender than it thinks — but only if the assets are real, identifiable and unencumbered.

A guarantee from somebody the lender trusts more than you. In the UAE this mostly means a federal scheme, and it comes with a sector list. More on it below.

The reason to lay these out as a set is that the answer to "can we borrow?" is rarely yes or no. It is which of these four can you produce, and the sources of money differ sharply on which ones they will look at.

The last row is the point of the whole exercise. Only one column on that grid is buying the plan, and it is the column that takes part of your company in exchange. Everything to the left of it is buying something it can seize. A founder who spends four weeks polishing projections and no time on the security position has prepared for the wrong meeting — and the three business plans a UAE file actually needs, each written for a different reader, are set out under free zone company formation.

The security cheque is not the instrument founders still think it is

Undated cheques still change hands here as security — to landlords, to suppliers, to lenders, occasionally to an investor. Founders sign them believing they are handing over a criminal deterrent, and that belief is out of date by several years.

Federal Decree-Law No. 14 of 2020, which entered into force on 2 January 2022, amended the Commercial Transactions Law and disapplied the Penal Code provisions that had made the ordinary dishonoured cheque a criminal offence. It did not make the cheque weaker. It made it faster: a dishonoured cheque became directly enforceable, so the holder goes to enforcement rather than bringing a fresh case and waiting for judgment. Alongside it, the Central Bank instructed banks from the same date that where an account holds part of the value, the bank must release what is there rather than return the instrument whole.

Two consequences matter to anyone financing a young company. The first is that a security cheque is now a civil enforcement instrument against your company and, where you signed personally, against you — quicker to act on than the criminal route it replaced, and correspondingly less negotiable once it is presented. The second is that criminal exposure did not vanish entirely; it survives in narrower circumstances, including cheques drawn on an account that has been closed. Neither of those is a reason to refuse a cheque. Both are reasons to know what you signed, and to keep a record of every undated one outstanding — a list most founders cannot produce on request by month eighteen.

The public money, and the sentence that decides whether it is for you

Search for UAE business funding and the results are dominated by government programmes. They are real. Most of them are also narrower than the headline, and the narrowing happens in one line of eligibility that the aggregator sites tend to leave out.

Emirates Development Bank is the federal instrument, and its Credit Guarantee Scheme works the way such schemes work everywhere: EDB does not lend to you, it stands behind part of a facility a partner bank lends to you, which changes the bank's arithmetic on a borrower with no history. When the scheme was launched EDB described cover of up to 85% on facilities up to AED 2 million for start-ups and up to 70% on facilities up to AED 5 million for established small and medium businesses; individual agreements signed with partner banks since have been announced at lower coverage. Treat the percentage as a question for the specific bank rather than a national figure, and ask it as one. The constraint that decides eligibility for most readers is not the percentage but the sector: EDB's mandate runs to manufacturing, technology, healthcare, renewables and food security. A consultancy, a brokerage or a general trading company is outside that list, and no amount of framing moves it inside.

Khalifa Fund for Enterprise Development in Abu Dhabi is the programme most often cited to expatriate founders and the one least available to them. Its funding schemes are for UAE nationals. Its advisory, training and incubation services are open more widely, and those are worth taking on their own terms — but they are not money. Which founder support programmes a non-national can actually join, and the screen each one applies before it will look at an application, is worked through in the government funds are gated on an Emirati passport.

Underneath both sits Cabinet Resolution No. 22 of 2016, which gives the UAE its unified definition of a small or medium enterprise. It is not a single threshold: it sets headcount and revenue limits that differ for the trading, industrial and services sectors, and a business can fall on either side of the line depending on which sector it is treated as being in. That definition is the gate on a good deal of public support, and it is worth establishing which side of it you sit on before an application is written rather than after it is refused.

The honest summary is short. Federal and emirate-level support in this country is heavily weighted toward industry, toward priority sectors, and in several important cases toward citizens. If none of those describes you, the public shelf is mostly advisory services and access to a network, and planning a first year around it is planning around something that is not there. What that shelf genuinely holds, sorted into the support a foreign founder can reach and the capital most of them cannot, is set out in what the UAE SME ecosystem actually offers.

What actually funds a first year, in the files we see

Very little of it is a bank.

The dominant source is the founder's own capital, followed by money from people who already know the founder. After that comes the customer: a deposit, a retainer, staged payments, an annual licence paid up front. Working capital extracted from customers is the cheapest money a young company will ever raise, and negotiating payment terms is a financing decision that founders classify as a sales decision. Then supplier credit, which is credit even though nobody calls it that, and which accumulates its own quiet record of whether you pay on time.

Two clarifications, because both cost people money. The share capital figure on your licence is not funding and in most cases is not even a payment — that is a separate question, set out in the share capital figure is a promise, not a payment. And money put in by a shareholder as a loan rather than as equity is a connected-person transaction: it has to be priced at arm's length, documented before drawdown rather than reconstructed afterwards, and disclosed. What that does on the way back out is covered in repatriating profit from a UAE company.

One tax rule that will not be your problem, and one that might

The corporate tax law limits how much interest a company can deduct, and the limit is widely quoted at founders as though it were a live constraint. It is not, at this scale. Net interest expenditure is deductible up to the greater of 30% of adjusted EBITDA or AED 12 million, with disallowed amounts carried forward for ten tax periods, under Ministerial Decision No. 126 of 2023. A company whose net interest cost is below AED 12 million never reaches the cap. That is almost every business reading this.

The rule that does reach you is the arm's length one. Interest paid to a shareholder, a parent or an affiliate is tested on whether an unconnected lender would have charged it, and a rate invented at year end to create a deduction is the version that gets found. UAE corporate tax sets out the wider framework this sits inside.

Where borrowing is the wrong purchase

We would rather talk a client out of a facility than arrange one that ends badly.

When the shortfall is a pricing problem. Debt does not fix a margin. It postpones the discovery of it, with interest, and the business that emerges eighteen months later is the same business carrying a repayment schedule.

When the only security available is the family home or the household's savings. A personal guarantee given by a founder whose entire net worth sits behind it is not a business decision; it is a bet on one outcome with no second position. The limited liability you paid to create is being handed back, and it should at least be handed back knowingly.

When the money is for formation costs. A company that must borrow to pay its own licence, visas and first year of premises has not been under-financed — it has been mis-sized. What a low-cost UAE licence leaves out sets out what that first year actually contains.

When a facility is being sold to you alongside the licence. Nobody arranging a trade licence is in a position to promise credit, because the decision belongs to a lender applying its own tests to a file that does not yet exist. A guaranteed funding line in a formation package is a claim about somebody else's future decision.

When the need is trade finance and there is no trade. Letters of credit and import facilities are extended against a shipping and payment history. A first-year company asking for a facility against projected volumes is offered an account, and that is the correct answer.

When equity is honestly the right instrument and debt is being chosen to avoid dilution. A business with no assets, no history and a plan that has not been tested is describing a venture risk, and venture risk is priced in shares. Structuring a UAE company that investors can fund covers what has to be true of the entity before that conversation is possible.

Becoming lendable is something a company accumulates, and it starts on day one

Nothing above says a UAE company cannot borrow. It says the borrowing is bought with a record, and the record is built out of unremarkable things done consistently.

Run the operating account rather than parking it. Get accounts prepared and, where the zone or the tax position calls for it, audited — the same statements that satisfy a licence renewal are the ones a credit file is read from, and our audit and accounting page covers what that involves. Invoice named counterparties on written terms, because a receivable is only security if somebody would pay it. Keep the assets clean and know what is already pledged. Take a small facility early, use it, and repay it, because a credit file with nothing in it scores like a bad one.

Do that and the third-year conversation is a different conversation, held with an institution that can see what you did rather than read what you intend. What no licence, no free zone and no consultant can do is compress it.

Frequently asked questions