Your mainland company’s real documents are in Arabic, and the English beside them is a translation

Every guide to mainland setup carries a section called cultural and language barriers, and every one of them fills it with advice about negotiation styles and attending local events. The advice is harmless and it is answering the wrong question, because the language issue in a UAE company is not a matter of etiquette. It is procedural, it is written into the law of civil procedure, and it has a licensed profession attached to it.

The short version: the courts work in Arabic. A document in another language reaches a court through a translator on the Ministry of Justice's record, and not through any other translator. The constitution of an onshore company is executed in front of a notary working from the Arabic. So the English text you read, negotiated and signed is, in the places where it matters most, the second copy.

The old advice named this obstacle and got the important one backwards

The material this article replaces listed five challenges in mainland setup. Two are worth correcting before anything else.

The first is the one it led on: that a mainland company requires a UAE national holding 51 per cent, and that finding a reliable sponsor is the central difficulty. That ceased to be the default position for most onshore activities in 2021. A short residual list survives and specific structures still involve a local service agent, but a founder reading the old sentence today would spend the first month of the project solving a problem that no longer exists — and possibly give away equity to solve it. The current position is in four UAE obligations you are still being sold.

The second is this one: an operational, procedural, entirely learnable language requirement, filed under culture and then answered with advice about networking. It is the only item on the old list that is still true, still costs money and still surprises people, and it was the one written up least usefully.

The document set that exists in Arabic first

Read the right-hand column. Six different bodies touch the file, and each of them holds a version of a document in Arabic. The English you have on your laptop is not any of those versions.

That is the practical finding of the whole subject: your company's records exist in Arabic in the hands of the authorities, and your English copies are for you. When the two disagree, the disagreement is discovered at the worst possible moment, and it is discovered by someone reading the Arabic.

A legal translator is a licensed profession, not a supplier chosen on price

This is where founders reliably economise and reliably should not.

Translation for legal purposes in the UAE may not be practised except by someone entered on the Ministry of Justice's list and holding a licence from the competent authority. The Ministry maintains that record and publishes a search service, so whether a given translator is on it is a question you can answer yourself in a minute. Entry on the list requires a qualification the Ministry recognises, and adding a language to an existing licence has its own requirements.

Two consequences follow. A translation produced by anyone not on that list may be perfectly accurate and still be refused where a certified translation is required — the objection is not to the quality but to the certification. And a cheap translation of a document you will rely on for years is a false economy in a very specific way: an error in a translated memorandum is an error in the text a notary executed and a court will read, and correcting it later is a document amendment rather than a correction.

Our legal translation page covers the service side of this, and document attestation and legalisation for the UAE covers the separate chain a foreign document has to travel before a translator sees it at all.

Where English is permitted, and where it is not

The position is not uniform, and knowing where the line falls is worth more than any general rule.

The UAE courts operate in Arabic, and a litigant who does not speak it is heard through an interpreter. The Civil Procedure Law does allow for specialised sections in which proceedings, judgments and decisions may be conducted in English, on a decision by the President of the Federal Judicial Council or the head of the relevant local judicial authority. That is an exception operated by the judiciary rather than an option a party selects.

The two financial free zones are different in kind rather than in degree. The DIFC Courts are an English-language common law judiciary. ADGM applies English common law directly. In those jurisdictions English is the working language of the law itself, not a translation of it.

It is worth being precise about what that does and does not mean, because the shorthand "free zones work in English" is wrong. Administratively, most free zones will deal with you in English. Judicially, only the financial free zones are English-language jurisdictions. A company in an ordinary free zone with a dispute outside that zone's own processes is heading for a court that works in Arabic like any other. Which forum ends up reading the contract is settled by the contract itself, long before anyone falls out, and that choice is worked through in the court that reads your contract is chosen before the dispute.

What this costs, and what it costs to get wrong

The running cost is small and predictable: certified translation of the foreign documents in your formation pack, then of anything you later file. It is a line item, it recurs rarely, and it is not where the money is.

The failure cost sits somewhere else, and it is worth naming. A bilingual contract whose two columns do not say the same thing is a dispute waiting for a trigger. Many bilingual contracts contain a clause stating which version prevails — read yours, because a founder who assumes the English governs and finds a prevailing-language clause pointing the other way has been operating on the wrong document since signature. Where no such clause exists, the version a UAE court reads is the Arabic one, through a certified translation if it has to make one itself.

The same applies to the constitution. If the Arabic memorandum executed before the notary says something the English draft did not, the executed text is the company's constitution. That is not a trap; it is what execution means. It is only a trap if nobody read the Arabic.

Where none of this needs to concern you

If you are incorporating in DIFC or ADGM, this article is describing a different jurisdiction. Your governing documents will be in English, your court works in English, and the translation question arises only for documents you bring in from elsewhere.

If you are a solo consultant on a free zone package with a template constitution and no negotiated terms, the exposure is small. You are signing the authority's own document, which is internally consistent by construction. Spend the attention on the activity list instead.

If your contracts are with foreign counterparties, seated abroad or arbitrated, the language of a UAE court may never be reached at all. The clause decides that, and the clause is worth an hour of a lawyer's time at signature — a point we make more generally in setting up in Dubai is choosing an incorporating authority.

If you are being sold cultural training as part of a setup package, decline it and buy a translator instead. One of the two is a legal requirement.

Three things to establish before you sign anything bilingual

Ask which version prevails, and get the answer from the document rather than from the person handing it to you. Ask who translated it and whether that person is on the Ministry of Justice record — a name you can check beats a firm's assurance. And before the constitution is executed, have the Arabic read by someone who is not the person who drafted it, because the reading takes an hour and the document governs the company for as long as it exists.

Frequently asked questions